Feasibility of tracheal reconstruction using silicone-stented aortic allografts.

OBJECTIVES: Tracheal reconstruction post-extensive resection remains an unresolved challenge in thoracic surgery. This study evaluates the use of aortic allografts (AAs) for tracheal replacement and reconstruction in a rat model, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of tracheal regeneration. METHODS: AAs from female rats were employed for tracheal reconstruction in 36 male rats, with the replacement exceeding half of the tracheal length. To avert collapse, silicone stents were inserted into the AA lumens. No immunosuppressive therapy was administered. The rats were euthanized biweekly, and the AAs were examined for neovascularization, cartilage formation, respiratory epithelial ingrowth, submucosal gland regeneration and the presence of the Sex-determining region of Y-chromosome (SRY) gene. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without severe complications. The AA segments were effectively integrated into the tracheal framework, with seamless distinction at suture lines. Histological analysis indicated an initial inflammatory response, followed by the development of squamous and mucociliary epithelia, new cartilage ring formation and gland regeneration. In situ hybridization identified the presence of the SRY gene in newly formed cartilage rings, confirming that regeneration was driven by recipient cells. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of AAs transforming into functional tracheal conduits, replicating the main structural and functional characteristics of the native trachea. The findings indicate that this approach offers a novel pathway for tissue regeneration and holds potential for treating extensive tracheal injuries.

Paediatric aortic valve replacement using decellularized allografts: a multicentre update following 143 implantations and five-year mean follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Decellularized aortic homografts (DAH) were introduced in 2008 as a further option for paediatric aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: Prospective, multicentre follow-up of all paediatric patients receiving DAH for AVR in 8 European centres. RESULTS: A total of 143 DAH were implanted between February 2008 and February 2023 in 137 children (106 male, 74%) with a median age of 10.8 years (interquartile range 6.6-14.6). Eighty-four (59%) had undergone previous cardiac operations and 24 (17%) had undergone previous AVR. The median implanted DAH diameter was 21 mm (interquartile range 19-23). The median operation duration was 348 min (227-439) with a median cardiopulmonary bypass time of 212 min (171-257) and a median cross-clamp time of 135 min (113-164). After a median follow-up of 5.3 years (3.3-7.2, max. 15.2 years), the primary efficacy end-points peak gradient (median 14 mmHg, 9-28) and regurgitation (median 0.5, interquartile range 0-1, grade 0-3) showed good results but an increase over time. Freedom from death/explantation/endocarditis/bleeding/thromboembolism at 5 years were 97.8 ± 1.2/88.7 ± 3.3/99.1 ± 0.9/100 and 99.2 ± 0.8%, respectively. Freedom from death/explantation/endocarditis/bleeding/thromboembolism at 10 years were 96.3 ± 1.9/67.1 ± 8.0/93.6 ± 3.9/98.6 ± 1.4 and 86.9 ± 11.6%, respectively. In total, 21 DAH were explanted. Seven were replaced by a mechanical AVR, 1 Ross operation was performed and a re-do DAH was implanted in 13 patients with no redo mortality. The calculated expected adverse events were lower for DAH compared to cryopreserved homograft patients (mean age 8.4 years), and in the same range as for Ross patients (9.2 years) and mechanical AVR (13.0 years). CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale prospective analysis demonstrates excellent mid-term survival using DAH with adverse event rates comparable to paediatric Ross procedures.

Five-year results from a prospective, single-arm European trial on decellularized allografts for aortic valve replacement-the ARISE Study and ARISE Registry Data.

OBJECTIVES: Decellularized aortic homografts (DAH) were introduced as a new option for aortic valve replacement for young patients. METHODS: A prospective, EU-funded, single-arm, multicentre study in 8 centres evaluating non-cryopreserved DAH for aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (99 male) were prospectively enrolled in the ARISE Trial between October 2015 and October 2018 with a median age of 30.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15.9-55.1]; 45% had undergone previous cardiac operations, with 19% having 2 or more previous procedures. The mean implanted DAH diameter was 22.6 mm (standard deviation 2.4). The median operation duration was 312 min (IQR 234-417), the median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 154 min (IQR 118-212) and the median cross-clamp time 121 min (IQR 93-150). No postoperative bypass grafting or renal replacement therapy were required. Two early deaths occurred, 1 due to a LCA thrombus on day 3 and 1 due ventricular arrhythmia 5 h postoperation. There were 3 late deaths, 1 death due to endocarditis 4 months postoperatively and 2 unrelated deaths after 5 and 7 years due to cancer and Morbus Wegener resulting in a total mortality of 3.47%. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years [IQR 5.1-6.4, mean 5.5 years. (standard deviation 1.3) max. 7.6 years], the primary efficacy end-points peak gradient with median 11.0 mmHg (IQR 7.8-17.6) and regurgitation of median 0.5 (IQR 0-0.5) of grade 0-3 were excellent. At 5 years, freedom from death/reoperation/endocarditis/bleeding/thromboembolism were 97.9%/93.5%/96.4%/99.2%/99.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year results of the prospective multicentre ARISE trial continue to show DAH to be safe for aortic valve replacement with excellent haemodynamics.

The fusion rates at different times of cortical iliac crest autograft or allograft compared with cages after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The cortical iliac crest autograft (CICA)/structural allograft (SA) has still been recognized as the gold standard for the ACDF technique for its high degree of histocompatibility and osteoinduction ability though the flourishing and evolving cage development. However, there was no further indication for using CICA/SA in ACDF based on basic information of inpatients. Our operative experience implied that applying CICA/SA has an advantage on faster fusion but not the long-term fusion rate. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the fusion rates between CICA and cage, between SA and cage, and between CICA/CA and cage. METHODS: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was conducted to identify these clinical trials that investigated the postoperative 3, 6, 12 and 24 months fusion rates of CICA/structural SA versus cage. Assessment of risk of bias, data extraction and statistical analysis were then carried out by two independent authors with the resolve-by-consensus method. The primary outcome was fusion rate at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were also meta-analyzed such as hardware complications, operative duration and hospitalization time. Our meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (Identifier: CRD42022345247). RESULT: A total of 3451 segments (2398 patients) derived from 34 studies were included after the screening of 3366 articles. The segmental fusion rates of CICA were higher than cages at 3 (P = 0.184, I2 = 40.9%) and 6 (P = 0.147, I2 = 38.8%) months postoperatively, but not 12 (P = 0.988, I2 = 0.0%) and 24 (P = 0.055, I2 = 65.6%) months postoperatively. And there was no significant difference in segmental fusion rates between SA and cage at none of 3 (P = 0.047, I2 = 62.2%), 6 (P = 0.179, I2 = 41.9%) and 12 (P = 0.049, I2 = 58.0%) months after operations. As for secondary outcomes, the CICA was inferior to cages in terms of hardware complications, operative time, blood loss, hospitalization time, interbody height, disk height and Odom rating. The hardware complication of using SA was significantly higher than the cage, but not the hospitalization time, disk height, NDI and Odom rating. CONCLUSION: Applying CICA has an advantage on faster fusion than using a cage but not the long-term fusion rate in ACDF. Future high-quality RCTs regarding the hardware complications between CICA and cage in younger patients are warranted for the deduced indication.

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement after pulmonary homograft dysfunction.

Pulmonary homograft dysfunction is challenging to treat in patients with a previous Ross procedure, and results in significant morbidity and mortality in case of reoperation. We report the case of a patient with early severe pulmonary homograft stenosis 18 months after a Ross procedure and successful management using transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.

Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 26.5 months (24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22° (10°-31°) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8° (16.5°-33.5°) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5° (-23° to -12°) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7° (2.2°-1.5°) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4° retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sex- and age-matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered.

Treatment failures (revision or arthroplasty) after knee osteochondral allograft transplantation with minimum two-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) has been associated with good short- to mid-term outcomes, however, treatment failures occur more frequently than desired. This study used data from a lifelong outcomes registry to analyze knee OCAT treatment failure rates, variables associated with knee OCAT treatment failures, and outcomes after revision or arthroplasty surgery for knee OCAT treatment failures. METHODS: Patient outcomes were followed after knee OCAT performed using standard preservation (SP) or Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS®) allografts. The study population consisted of patients undergoing primary OCAT with ≥ 2-year follow-up. For comparisons, the treatment failure population was defined by patients in the study population with documented treatment failure (revision or arthroplasty) with ≥ 2-year follow-up after failure. Functional graft survival was defined as no further need for revision surgery after primary or revision OCAT. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (n = 136 males; 51.9%) were analyzed. SP grafts were used for 59 cases and MOPS grafts were used for 203 cases. Treatment failure was documented in 61 cases (23.3%). MOPS grafts were 3.3 times more likely to be associated with functional graft survival. SP grafts, older patient age, higher BMI, tibiofemoral bipolar OCAT and non-adherence to the postoperative rehabilitation protocol were significantly associated with treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Knee OCAT resulted in functional graft survival at short- to mid-term follow-up in the majority (70-88%) of cases. In addition, revision of primary OCAT resulted in functional graft survival for at least 2 years after revision surgery in the majority (66%) of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, prospective cohort study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Achilles Tendon Allograft.

PURPOSE: This study sought to assess the long-term structural integrity of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions using Achilles tendon allografts by measuring the side-to-side difference in anterior-posterior tibial translation between the operative knee and the contralateral, asymptomatic knee. METHODS: This study was a retrospective case series consisting of patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft. Allografts were chemically processed using the AlloWash or AlloTrue methods and then received either gamma radiation or electron beam radiation (range: 0.95 to 1.4 Mrad dose). At the time of follow-up, anterior-posterior tibial translation of both the operative and contralateral knees was measured using the Lachmeter® device. Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. RESULTS: The analysis included 20 patients (mean age: 41.38 ± 14.27 years) with a mean follow-up time of 7.01 ± 5.24 years. There were no graft failures requiring revision during the study period. The mean side-to-side difference in laxity between operative and contralateral knees was 1.10 ± 2.02 mm. Two patients (10%) met the criteria for complete ACL injury at the time of follow-up, while the remaining 18 patients (90%) met the criteria for no ACL injury. The mean IKDC score was 83.5 ± 13.8, and mean KOOS score was 88.4 ± 10.7. CONCLUSIONS: Primary ACL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft in skeletally mature patients resulted in maintained knee stability and good functional outcomes over the long-term postoperative period.

Mixing Allograft and Xenograft for a Predictable Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedure: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: An alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedure is commonly performed to preserve ridge width and height for optimal dental implant placement. Mixing different sources of bone grafts may help maximize their properties to obtain predictable ARP results. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series is to highlight the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a combined allograft and xenograft approach for a predictable ARP procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven clinical cases that required tooth extraction and future implant placement were selected for this case series. All surgeries were performed by a single clinician in a private practice setting. All cases underwent an ARP procedure, which included atraumatic extraction, degranulation, assessment of the socket, and the use of a combination of allograft and xenograft fibers/granules in a 1:1 mixing approach. Based on the socket defect, either a type I or type III collagen membrane was used during the procedure. In all cases CBCT imaging was done prior to surgical implant placement, and digital implant planning was performed integrating interdisciplinary best practices. Implant placement was carried out using manufacturer's recommendations. RESULTS: Five male and five female patients were included in the study, with one of the male patients having two teeth extracted for a total of 11 cases. The reasons for teeth extraction included fracture, endodontic failure, periodontal infection, and subgingival decay. Healing was uneventful after the ARP procedure for all patients. A minimum of 120 days elapsed between ARP and the surgical implant procedure. Complete radiographic bone fill was observed in the CBCT image for all extraction sites, and no additional bone augmentation was needed at the time of implant placement. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates that based on clinical and radiographic outcomes, a combination of allogenic and xenogenic bone substitute can be utilized to obtain predictable results following ARP. Future randomized controlled trials that can compare different ratios between the two biomaterials are indicated to guide clinicians in the mixing protocols and their outcomes.

Proximal Femur Salvage in Revision Knee Arthroplasty Due to Oncologic Indications: Long-term Results of Onlay and Overlapping Allograft in Revision Surgeries.

Background: Mechanical failures of tumor endoprosthesis in the distal femur usually require revision surgery. We investigated if the proximal femur host bone can be salvaged by onlay and overlapping allograft in revision surgeries due to aseptic loosening and stem fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (7 men and 11 women) with osteosarcoma around the knee. The entire cohort was classified into three subgroups (no bone graft: 6, onlay allograft: 7, and overlapping allograft: 5) according to our treatment strategy. Results: The median interval from the initial surgery to the revision was 94.5 months (range, 21-219 months), and the median follow-up period from the revision surgery was 88.0 months (range, 24-179 months). At the last follow-up, 9 of the 18 patients maintained their endoprostheses, and the 5-year prosthesis survival rate was 57.9%. Limb survival was 100%. Five-year prosthesis survival rate was 66.7% in the no bone graft group, 85.7% in the onlay allograft group while 30.0% in the overlapping allograft group. In the no bone graft group and onlay allograft group, 66.7% (4/6) and 57.1% (4/7) maintained their revision prostheses while no prostheses survived in the overlapping allograft group. Recurrent stem loosening was observed in 14.2% (1/7) and 60.0% (3/5) of the onlay allograft and overlapping allograft groups, respectively, despite allograft bone union. The complication rate was 66.7% (12/18) in the entire cohort. The most common type of complication was infection (n = 6), followed by aseptic loosening (n = 4) and mechanical failure (n = 2). Conclusions: This study indicates that onlay allograft can be used as a supportive method in revising failed endoprosthesis if the extent of host bone destruction is extensive. However, applying overlapping allograft to secure bone stock showed a high rate of mechanical failures and infection in the long term. Future studies with a larger cohort are necessary to assess the prognostic factors for the higher complication rate in overlapping allograft and the need for overlapping allograft. Surveillance with consideration of the risk of anteromedial osteolysis in allograft and efforts for prevention of periprosthetic infection are essential.

[Use of allografts in vascular surgery infections]. / Homograftok használata érsebészeti fertozésekben.

With the growing number of patients with vascular endografts, the number of patients with graft infections has also increased. Septic conditions and the choice of grafts are an important challenge in vascular surgery. The aim of this study was to review the literature of the last 7 years showing allograft use in septic conditions in vascular surgery which helps provide insight into the current results of vascular allografts. Data were collected between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2022. A systematic search was conducted for publications of cryopreserved allograft usage for vascular infection in PubMed and Medline databases. The results of the publications were reviewed based on the following key endpoints: study design, patient's characteristics, mortality rate, graft related complication and reintervention rate, graft patency, limb salvage, graft reinfection rate and survival rate. After a systematic search, 16 publications were included. The articles were divided into two groups: aortic and peripheral. The aortic group included 12 studies covering the data of 542 patients. Early mortality rate (<30 days) was between 2.8% and 42.8%. Allograft-related reintervention rates ranged between 5.9% and 29% (early and late). The rate of graft reinfection was below 10%. 4 studies were included in the peripheral group covering the data of 252 patients. Early mortality rate (<30 days) was between 2.0% and 38%. Allograft-related reintervention rates ranged between 4.0% and 55% (early and late). Reinfection rate was around 4%, but only poor quality data were available. Infections in vascular surgery remain a challenging problem, however, cryopreserved allografts show low reinfection rate and reasonable durability, thus, allografts may be an acceptable option for reconstruction. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(32): 1256-1262.

Pulmonary homograft failure presents as abdominal ascites.

Ascites is a condition typically attributed to liver disease but can be cardiac in aetiology as well. We report of an atypical case of pulmonary homograft failure status-post the Ross-Yacoub procedure as an underlying cause of anasarca. A man in his mid-30s with a history of congenital heart disease presented with abdominal distension and exercise intolerance. His prior history was relevant for congenital bicuspid aortic valve with critical aortic stenosis. Abdomen and pelvis CT revealed a grossly dilated inferior vena cava while transthoracic echocardiogram showed severe homograft pulmonary stenosis and regurgitation. Further investigation with cardiac MRI demonstrated severe pulmonary valve stenosis and regurgitation with significant tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular dilatation. The transcatheter stent in the right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduit followed by transcatheter valve replacement, which resulted in full resolution of his presenting symptoms.

Wrist arthrodesis combined with a bulk bone allograft for implant loosening after total wrist arthroplasty: A case report.

Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a challenging procedure for wrist joints severely destroyed by rheumatoid arthritis. The most common postoperative complication of TWAs is the loosening of the carpal component. Revision surgeries for failed TWAs can be complicated owing to severe bone loss and concomitant soft-tissue problems. Here, we report a case (68-year-old woman with a history of rheumatoid arthritis for 24 years) of severe aseptic loosening of semi-constrained TWA and its salvage surgery. During the primary arthroplasty procedure, severe instability at the second through fifth carpometacarpal joints was observed and arthrodesis of these joints was required. The radiographs obtained 9 months after surgery showed loosening of the carpal component. Subsequently, she suffered a stroke, resulting in a loss of follow-up, and higher stress was loaded on her upper extremities during standing and walking. In the radiograph taken at her revisit 25 months after the primary surgery, the subsidence of the carpal component progressed and loosening of the radial component was observed. Total wrist arthrodesis was performed using a bulk bone allograft of the femoral head, combined with a penetrating Wrist Fusion Rod®. Rapid bone union was achieved without soft-tissue irritation. We conclude that wrist arthrodesis with a bulk bone allograft combined with an intramedullary nail is a reasonable option for failed total wrist arthroplasty.

Young Age and Concomitant or Prior Bony Realignment Procedures are Associated with Decreased Risk of Failure of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee: A Nationwide Database Study.

OBJECTIVE: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a restorative surgical option for large, full-thickness chondral or osteochondral defects in the knee. Variability in outcomes reporting has led to a broad range of graft survival rates. Using rate of salvage surgery following OCA as a failure metric, the purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors for failure in a nationwide cohort. DESIGN: The M151Ortho PearlDiver database was queried for patients aged 20 to 59 who underwent primary OCA between 2010 and 2020. Patients with prior cartilage procedures or arthroplasty were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to characterize cumulative rate of salvage surgery, defined as any patient subsequently undergoing revision OCA, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effect of several variables on odds of salvage surgery. RESULTS: Around 6,391 patients met inclusion criteria. Cumulative 5-year salvage rate was 1.71%, with 68.8% in the first 2 years. Age 20 to 29 and concomitant or prior bony realignment procedures were associated with significantly decreased rate of salvage surgery (age-adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.99, P = 0.046; realignment-aOR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.04-0.75, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest OCA cohort studied to date, less than 2% of patients required salvage surgery. Young age and bony realignment were protective. These findings suggest that OCA in the knee is a durable cartilage-restoration procedure, especially in young patients with corrected alignment.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions Supplemented With Cellular or Noncellular Allografts Have Similar Radiographic Fusion and Clinical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess radiographic fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) supplemented with either demineralized bone matrix or ViviGen in a polyetheretherketone biomechanical interbody cage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cellular and noncellular allografts are utilized as adjuncts in attempts to improve fusion after ACDF. The purpose of this study was to assess radiographic fusion and clinical outcomes after ACDF supplemented with cellular or noncellular allografts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single surgeon's clinical practice database was interrogated for consecutive patients who underwent a primary ACDF using cellular or noncellular allograft from 2017 to 2019. These subjects were matched by age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and levels operated. Patient demographic and preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Visual Analog Scale Pain, Neck Disability Index, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and Eating Assessment Tool 10 were collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographic evidence of fusion was determined by <2 mm motion between spinous processes on flexion and extension radiographs and assessing bony bridging at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 68 total patients, with 34 patients in each group, and 69 and 67 operative levels in the cellular and noncellular allograft groups, respectively. There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, or smoking status between groups ( P >0.05). There was no difference in number of 1-level, 2-level, 3-level, or 4-level ACDFs between cellular and noncellular groups ( P >0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there was no difference in the percent of operated levels with <2 mm motion between spinous processes, complete bony bridging, or both <2 mm motion and complete bony bridging in the cellular and noncellular groups ( P >0.05). There was no difference in the number of patients fused at all operated levels at 3, 6, or 12 months postoperatively ( P >0.05). No patient required revision ACDF for symptomatic pseudarthrosis. There was no significant difference in PROMs between the cellular and noncellular groups at 12 months postoperatively except for improved EQ-5D and PROMIS-physical in the cellular compared with noncellular group ( P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Similar radiographic fusion rates were achieved with cellular and noncellular allografts at all operated levels with similar PROMs in the cellular and noncellular groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Thus, ACDFs supplemented with cellular allograft demonstrate adequate radiographic fusion rates when compared with noncellular allografts with similar patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients May Result in Acceptable Graft Failure Rate in Nonpivoting Sports Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that pediatric patients have an increased risk of failure with allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, there is no study investigating whether allograft ACLR may be safe in older adolescent patients who are not returning to competitive pivoting sports (ie, low risk). The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes for low-risk older adolescents selected for allograft ACLR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients younger than 18 years who received a bone-patellar-tendon-bone allograft or autograft ACLR by a single orthopaedic surgeon from 2012 to 2020. Patients were offered allograft ACLR if they did not intend to return to pivoting sports for 1 year. The autograft cohort was matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and follow-up. Patients were excluded for skeletal immaturity, multiligamentous injury, prior ipsilateral ACLR, or concomitant realignment procedure. Patients were contacted to obtain patient-reported outcomes at ≥2 years follow-up, including single assessment numerical evaluation, surgery satisfaction, pain scores, Tegner Activity Scale, and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 68 allografts, 40 (59%) met inclusion and 28 (70%) were contacted. Among the 456 autografts, 40 (8.7%) were matched and 26 (65%) were contacted. Two allograft patients (2/40; 5%) failed at a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 36 (12, 60) months. There were 0/40 failures in the autograft cohort and 13/456 (2.9%) among the overall autografts; neither were significantly different from the allograft failure rate (both P > 0.05). Two (5.0%) patients in the autograft cohort required manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions. There were no significant differences between cohorts for single assessment numerical evaluation, Lysholm, Tegner, pain, and satisfaction scores (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although ACL allograft failure rates remain nearly two times higher than autograft failure rates in older adolescents, our study suggests that careful patient selection can potentially bring this failure rate down to an acceptable level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective matched cohort study.

Meniscal allograft transplantation, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and valgus high tibial osteotomy for meniscal-deficient, unstable, and varus knees: surgical technique and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and functional outcome of a salvage surgical approach with the combined procedures meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), in a cohort of patients treated for complex knee lesions evaluated up to a mid-term follow-up. METHODS: Eight patients (38.8 ± 4.6 years, 88% males) were treated arthroscopically with MAT without bone plugs combined with primary or revision ACLR and HTO and evaluated at basal, at a minimum of two years (short follow-up), and at a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (mid-term follow-up) with the VAS score for pain, Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score, WOMAC Osteoarthritis index, and Tegner score. Physical examination (Lachman and pivot-shift tests, arthrometer assessment) and radiographic evaluation (pre- and post-operative x-rays) were obtained. Complications and failures were also recorded. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was observed from baseline to five years in all clinical scores. In particular, the IKDC subjective score improved from 33.3 ± 20.7 to 73.1 ± 18.4 at short follow-up (p < 0.05), up to 78.3 ± 9.8 at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). A similar trend was demonstrated with the Lysholm, VAS, WOMAC, and Tegner score, even though only one patient reached the pre-injury activity level. Two patients had a worsening of the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade from preoperative (grade 1) to final follow-up (grade 2). No major complications and surgical failures were documented. CONCLUSION: The combined procedure of MAT, ACLR, and HTO presents few complications and failures and showed to be a valid option to reduce pain, recover knee function, and slow down the osteoarthritis process even in complex patients, with good and stable results up to a mid-term follow-up.

Comparative study of outcomes between allograft intervertebral disc transplantation and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study at least 5 years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) seriously affects the long-term efficacy of the operation. Therefore, our team has done a lot of research on allograft intervertebral disc transplantation (AIDT) to prove its feasibility and safety. This study will compare the efficacy between AIDT and ACDF in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. METHODS: All patients who received ACDF or AIDT in our hospital from 2000 to 2016 and followed up for at least 5 years were recruited and divided into ACDF and AIDT groups. The clinical outcomes including functional scores and radiological data of both groups were collected and compared preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months and last follow-up. Functional scores included Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale of Neck (N-VAS) and Arms (A-VAS) pain, the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) and imaging dates including digital radiographs in the lateral, hyperextension and flexion positions to assess the stability, sagittal balance and mobility of the cervical spine and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to assess the degeneration of adjacent segment. RESULTS: There were 68 patients with 25 in AIDT group and 43 in ACDF group. Satisfactory clinical results were obtained in both groups, but the long-term NDI score and N-VAS score in the AIDT group were better. The AIDT obtained the same stability and sagittal balance of the cervical spine as fusion surgery. The range of motion of adjacent segments can be restored to the preoperative level after transplantation, but this increases significantly after ACDF. There were significant differences in the superior adjacent segment range of motion (SROM) between two groups at 12 months (P = 0.039), 24 months (P = 0.035), 60 months (P = 0.039) and the last follow-up (P = 0.011). The inferior adjacent segment range of motion (IROM) and SROM had a similar trend in the two groups. The ratio value of the greyscale (RVG) of adjacent segments showed a downward trend. At the last follow-up, the RVG decreased more significantly in the ACDF group. At the last follow-up, there was a significant difference in the incidence of ASDeg between the two groups (P = 0.000). And the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASDis) is 22.86% in the ACDF group. CONCLUSION: The allograft intervertebral disc transplantation may be as an alternative technique to traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the management of cervical degenerative diseases. For the more, the results showed it would improve cervical kinematics and reduce the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration.

Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs rifampin-soaked Dacron for the treatment of infected aortic and iliac grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic and iliac graft infections remain complex clinical problems with high mortality and morbidity. Cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAAs) and rifampin-soaked Dacron (RSD) are options for in situ reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of CAA vs RSD in this setting. METHODS: Data from patients with aortic and iliac graft infections undergoing in situ reconstruction with either CAA or RSD from January 2002 through August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Our primary outcomes were freedom from graft-related reintervention and freedom from reinfection. Secondary outcomes included comparing trends in the use of CAA and RSD at our institution, overall survival, perioperative mortality, and major morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (80 RSD, 69 CAA) with a mean age of 68.9 and 69.1 years, respectively, were included. Endovascular stent grafts were infected in 60 patients (41 CAA group and 19 RSD group; P ≤ .01). Graft-enteric fistulas were more common in the RSD group (48.8% RSD vs 29.0% CAA; P ≤ .01). Management included complete resection of the infected graft (85.5% CAA vs 57.5% RSD; P ≤ .01) and aortic reconstructions were covered in omentum in 57 (87.7%) and 63 (84.0%) patients in the CAA and RSD group, respectively (P = .55). Thirty-day/in-hospital mortality was similar between the groups (7.5% RSD vs 7.2% CAA; P = 1.00). One early graft-related death occurred on postoperative day 4 due to CAA rupture and hemorrhagic shock. Median follow-up was 20.5 and 21.5 months in the CAA and RSD groups, respectively. Overall post-discharge survival at 5 years was similar, at 59.2% in the RSD group and 59.0% in the CAA group (P = .80). Freedom from graft-related reintervention at 1 and 5 years was 81.3% and 66.2% (CAA) vs 95.6% and 92.5% (RSD; P = .02). Indications for reintervention in the CAA group included stenosis (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), reinfection (n = 2), occlusion (n = 2), rupture (n = 1), and graft-limb kinking (n = 1). In the RSD group, indications included reinfection (n = 3), occlusion (n = 1), endoleak (n = 1), omental coverage (n = 1), and rupture (n = 1). Freedom from reinfection at 1 and 5 years was 98.3% and 94.9% (CAA) vs 92.5% and 87.2% (RSD; P = .11). Two (2.9%) and three patients (3.8%) in the CAA and RSD group, respectively, required graft explantation due to reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Aorto-iliac graft infections can be managed safely with either CAA or RSD in selected patients for in situ reconstruction. However, reintervention was more common with CAA use. Freedom from reinfection rates in the RSD group was lower, but this was not statistically significant. Conduit choice is associated with long-term surveillance needs and reinterventions.